Real Leaders Use the L Word

What is your big organizational initiative right now? Perhaps, you’re focused on increasing sales, decreasing production costs or streamlining internal processes. Maybe you’re in the strategic planning process or in budget hell.

Successful organizations have processes in place to continuously monitor the performance of every function of the business. Resources are allocated to examine the status of finance, production, logistics, service, partnerships, and even consumer perceptions of the brand or company. However, the ability to learn faster than the competition may give you the greatest advantage. And yet, many overlook the organizational L word: learning.

When was the last time you pulled your best and brightest people around the table to improve the way your company learns?

“Leadership and learning are indispensable to each other.”  – John F. Kennedy

Traditionally, the structure of learning has been a transfer of knowledge from the veterans at the top of the org chart that trickles down to the rookies at the bottom. However, changing demographics are creating an increasingly diverse and complex workplace. For the first time in history, your intellectual capital will be comprised of 5 different generations, and each subset is wildly different. This “generational tension” creates both obstacles and opportunities.

For example, consider the Millennials compared to their senior colleagues. While your veterans are gold mines of organizational history and industry knowledge, the rookies traded their pacifiers for the device du jour and they grew up with a very different perspective of the world. They see limitless possibilities, and have entirely different expectations than their older counterparts.

This combination of visionary optimism and a wealth of experience may seem to be a formula for success. However, it’s shortsighted to assume the intellectual capital of the organization is simply a sum of its parts.

A group of all-stars doesn’t magically create an all-star team.

In a recent SHRM poll, 47% of Millennials identified their senior leaders as “micro-managers who don’t value new ideas and are resistant to change.” On the other hand, 33% of the veterans found “a lack of respect, a need for supervision, and an inappropriate level of informality” in their younger colleagues. The vast differences in perceptions, expectations, and communication styles can impact engagement, innovation, and the bottom line like never before.

An organization’s culture of learning, or lack thereof, has never been more significant. Unless younger employees and seasoned vets and all the subsets in between learn how to learn from one another, the ROI on even the most talented group of individuals will never actualize. Today’s leading companies foster a culture of creative thinkers who can innovate, collaborate, troubleshoot and solve problems. They invest in their people and their ability to learn.

Learning how to learn is life’s most important skill.

Almost 30 years ago at the inception of personal computing, Shoshan Zuboff delineated the difference between computer-mediated work from earlier generations of mechanization and automation in her book, In the Age of the Smart Machine. Her conclusion was that there would eventually be a blurring of the demarcation between “work” and “learning,” to ultimate create a cultural shift from a “division of labor” to a “division of learning.”

That shift seems remarkably obvious given that the evolution of technology in our daily lives has allowed rapid global communications, immediate access to an exponential explosion of information, and the trend that market-changing disruptions will continue to accelerate. We’re getting smarter faster, and expectations of a competitive workforce align with that trajectory.

“Between the birth of the world and 2003, there were 5 exabytes of information created. We now create five exabytes every two days. See why it’s so painful to operate in information markets?” – Eric Schmidt, Google CEO

We’re long past the Taylorism principles of the industrial age:

“You’re not paid to think; shut up and do your job.” 

Thinking, ideating, innovating, and problem solving are exactly what leaders expect from their best people. Yet, many organizations fail to make learning how to learn a priority. Their focus is on the bottom line rather than how they will get there.

Crippled by either the force of inertia or a deeply entrenched top-down culture that neither promotes nor nurtures opportunities for people at all levels to become better learners, they are liken to the manufacturer who wants to make more parts faster but never stops to oil his machines. Despite the wealth of recent brain-based research illuminating how we learn most effectively, many organizations still fail to prioritize the practice of helping their employees become better learners.

The inevitable consequence of failing to learn how to learn is failing to improve the way you learn.

A culture of learning isn’t formed by a committee, and it isn’t an initiative delivered in a binder. It begins with understanding how we learn and an expectation to grow the collective capacity to learn. It’s nurtured by providing people with multiple opportunities to contribute.

People who feel valued for their contributions will seek out opportunities to learn and to share what they know with others. Driven by intrinsic rewards, they create a learning culture–one of colleagues and co-learners who are inspired to learn and inspire others to learn.  And if they don’t feel valued, they’ll seek out a place where they are and contribute there.

You can’t learn anything if you’re busy trying to look like the smartest guy in the room.

Effective leaders not only embrace the L word and create the conditions that enable people to learn better, they chart the course by demonstrating that they, too, value opportunities to learn. Learning is the foundation of their strategy, and learning how to learn is prioritized. By cultivating trust in the contributions of others and respecting the reciprocal rewards of a learning community regardless of titles or boxes on the organization chart, they’re able to grow their “division of labor” into a “division of learning.” These are the leaders that enable the powerful fusion of the gray knowledge with the green knowledge rather than sacrifice one for the other.

If you enjoyed this, the best way to tell me is with a comment or share!

Dr. Melissa Hughes is the founder and principal of The Andrick Group. Our mission is to engage, inspire, and educate people to increase their capacity for learning and creativity. We do this by providing tailored, dynamic workshops that help organizations improve their work by understanding how the brain works and applying that to achieve greater productivity, professional growth, and personal satisfaction.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s